Putting a crown on Meghan Markle head does not erase British debt to Africans

One should not overlook the optics and symbolism of having a woman of color as a member of a family that represents a most conspicuous and potent symbol of white European wealth and power. Surely, the white supremacists that Trump retweets–the Britain First crowd, those who embrace Brexit and assassinated a member of Parliament–are reacting to the news with horror and rage.

There’s something to be said for breaking down traditionally white spaces, whether the White House or Buckingham Palace, but the conversations cannot stop there, lest we praise the symbolism and lose sight of the substance.

The British royal family presided over the exploitation of untold millions of people in Africa, India and around the world. Britain’s national wealth, and the riches of the royal family were built off the backs of slaves, making the Industrial Revolution possible.

The Duke of York and his brother Charles II, founded the Royal African Company, an English slave-trading company, was founded by the Duke of York and his brother King Charles II. Britain dominated the international slave trade, and its raping and pillaging of West Africa was highly profitable for the royal family. According to the National Archives, between 1640 and 1807, Britain transported an estimated 3.1 million Africans to its colonies in the Caribbean, North and South America and other countries. Of that number, 2.7 million arrived.

When Britain abolished slavery in 1833, the country paid its 46,000 slave owners the modern-day equivalent of £17 billion (US$23 billion) in compensation, representing 40 percent of the government’s annual expenditures and the largest bailout in British history until the 2009 bank bailout. Those families and their present-day descendants became wealthy from the enslavement of Black people. Meanwhile, the 800,000 Africans, mostly working in the Caribbean plantations, received not a penny, and were forced to work as low wage apprentices for their former masters until 1838.

According to Dr. Robert Beckford, a British academic theologian, Britain owes the Caribbean a total of £7.5 trillion (US$10.1 trillion), which includes an estimated £4 trillion (US$5.4 trillion) it stole from the region in unpaid labor, £2.5 trillion (US$3.4 trillion) in unjust enrichment to the British economy, and another £1 trillion (US$1.3 trillion) in pain and suffering.

The British do not want to pay reparations, opting for an emphasis on trade and cooperation with Jamaica and its other former colonies in the Caribbean. The CARICOM member states have a ten-point plan to seek slavery reparations from European nations for “the region’s indigenous and African descendant communities who are the victims of Crimes against Humanity (CAH) in the forms of genocide, slavery, slave trading, and racial apartheid.”

The British royal family owes Black people untold wealth for African slavery and colonialism, and the millions of Black lives lost. These debts are not wiped out simply because Meghan Markle is wearing a crown.

One response to “Putting a crown on Meghan Markle head does not erase British debt to Africans”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: