chap on the left is former minister of housing and tourism irfaan ali
chap on the right is in charge of the clean up campaign ongoing in Guyana and an ubiquitous presence at the side of david granger for some weeks now
as late as 2014 bobby vieira was coordinating a number of events on behalf of irfaan ali and the ppp in the new york area
so how in 2015 is bobby vieira whispering in david granger’s ear? main mc at granger’s swearing in? coordinating the clean up campaign? managing the inauguration at the stadium? and who knows what else
we shall get to the bottom of it all, or at least try.
–
many moons ago circa 2002/03 in brooklyn i was present as a group of guyanese were catching up on the latest scandals pouring out of ppp guyana.
bobby vieira was there and spoke glowingly and at length about the real president of guyana, a man he referred to as short man.
a year or more would pass before i got a fuller picture following the news of shortman aka roger shaheed khan
so how in 2015 is bobby vieira whispering in david granger’s ear?
the road to damascus is a looong winding road, full of dangers and pitfalls
–
to be continued fuh sure
run tell dat
i said it dot com
free the land. free the people
More Posts
africa agriculture amerindian anil nandlall apnu afc bharrat jagdeo brasil corruption courtney crum-ewing david granger Donald Ramotar dub elections food forbes burnham fraud freedom georgetown guyana guyana police guysuco haiti ifa kamau cush jamaica joe harmon kaieteur news love mark jacobs mind music negroes parliament police brutality ppp president's college race racism Rape reggae revolution royston king shade house soul south africa venezuela
10 responses to “Bobby Vieira & the foreign agents behind Guyana’s new president”
-
If you don’t know, bro. you don’t know politrix. There will be many bobby Vieira’s whispering in the ears, mouths and assholes of the new rulers.
-
If i dont know what balwant?
-
-
Keep me informed.
-
Your purported factual comments are clearly an attempt at propagandization. You have taken the surname Vieira i.e. Okobo Vieira, and have attempted to weave bits and pieces: namely, Bobby being the Owner of Caribbean Cargo and his son’s use of the said business for illegal activities, as per the information you’ve presented to substantiate your claim, and seem to want to pseudo indict The senior Vieira. Clearly, those of us who do not have a bandwagon mentality or are not groupies, and are more intellectually astute can see your agenda. You began by using the first name of young Vieira, but by the conclusion of your post, you have the stand-alone last name, seemingly intending to insinuate illegal actions on the part of senior Vieira.
We are all aware that the US legal system is adept at bringing down and prosecuting all guilty parties in any illegal narcotics activities. Clearly, if senior Vieira was guilty of any criminal activity (as you seen to want to insinuate by reference to the business being his), our justice system would have spared you the trouble of attempting to project guilt by virtue of last name and proprietorship, by putting him where all the guilty parties.
Secondly, the other references you’ve made to Bobby Vieira’s role in the previous party and other like affiliations “in 2014” and now this current president, I’d like to point out, that when I last heard, and I believe you may have attested to this fact, Bobby Vieira’s many vocations include that of consultant-one that renders him the autonomy to market and execute his craft to whomever he desires. Additionally, his journalism skills and role make him apt and marketable to whomever, but especially if it is I, the interest of his birthplace. Your post and that of the responders to it seem to be personally motivated; they reflect that you guys may be haters or disgruntled, slighted people.-
Linda your english is long and heavy and i thank you. A casual observer would say you’ve exhibited perspicacious judgment. Non casual i, am more leaning to an antonym of perspicacious, dull
causing boredom; tedious; uninteresting: a dull sermon.
Second word in your opening statement exposes your defensive maneuvers. Tenuous at best, as in lacking a sound basis or weak. emotional attachment doesn’t count.
unless you’re attempting in maddening haste to malign the federal prosecutors office and by extension the us legal system nothing i’ve written can be categorised as “purported”
Curiously in your second salvo you pontificate on the us justice system you seem to know very little of. Guilt or innocence does not a conviction make in the us justice system. If your mind was adept as you purport, you would have already known this.
I am not a member of the legal profession and cannot indict vieira or anyone else, pseudo or otherwise. But you clearly seem to have a problem with facts
You seem unaware or uninterested to know that the material quoted is from a us federal court transcript. And not assembled out of thin air.
You’re either a student or disciple of vieira senior and therein lies the problem. Additionally you do not live in guyana, which explains the contagion
Only a whore sells his or her wares to “whomever” you should reflect on that. Hosting a presidential swearing in ceremony or managing the cleanup campaign or owning a shipping co. are not things i aspire to.
But you could still go ahead and call me a hater or senor disgruntled. for i do not want whores corrupting what we fought for many years and won on may 11
Some people like courtney crum-ewing didnt make it to may 11
I wont the least bit feel slighted by your name calling or your purported astute intellect.
-
-
Correction to the response re: Bobby Vieira: that should read “…if it’s in the interest” not “if it I”
Leave a Reply